![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:39:30 +0100 Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 04:52 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > > > So, user tasks running with SCHED_FIFO should be able to lock a system? > > I guess I see both sides of this argument - yes, it's userspace at > > fault, but in other cases when userspace is at fault, we take action > > (OOM, segfault, others). Isn't this situation just another case where > > the kernel needs to avoid the evils of userland going awry? > > FYI, Ingo queued the below. > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/31/344 > That's pretty different of course, but rlimit might be a suitable interface for implementing RLIMIT_MAX_CONTINUOUS_RT_MILLISECONDS. | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-12-22 11:55 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||