![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 04:52 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > So, user tasks running with SCHED_FIFO should be able to lock a system? > I guess I see both sides of this argument - yes, it's userspace at > fault, but in other cases when userspace is at fault, we take action > (OOM, segfault, others). Isn't this situation just another case where > the kernel needs to avoid the evils of userland going awry? FYI, Ingo queued the below. http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/31/344 -Mike | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-12-22 11:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||