lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Major regression on hackbench with SLUB (more numbers)
From
Date

On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 14:11 -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > If you aren't even motivated to fix the problems that have been reported,
> > then SLUB isn't even a _potential_ solution, it's purely a problem, and
> > since I am not IN THE LEAST interested in having three different
> > allocators around, SLUB is going to get axed.
>
> Not motivated? I have analyzed the problem in detail and when it comes
> down to it there is not much impact that I can see in real life
> applications. I have always responded to the regression reported also via
> TPC-C.

But you are dismissing the hackbench regression, which is not a small
one. It runs an astonishing 10x slower.





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-21 23:19    [W:0.173 / U:0.356 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site