![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Thanks for catching this!
>>> Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> 21.12.07 03:30 >>>
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:14:05PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Remains the question whether it is intended that many, perhaps even
> large, tables are compiled in without ever having a chance to get used,
> i.e. whether there shouldn't #ifdef CONFIG_xxx get added.
> -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_param_table[] = {
> +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
we lost the _param, which will cause a duplicate definition with ..
> -static struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
> +static const struct trans_ctl_table trans_net_ax25_table[] = {
cut-n-paste thinko ?
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-12-21 07:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||