[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] teach about list_for_each
Em Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 01:03:35PM +0100, Christer Weinigel escreveu:
> Hi Andy,
> you seem to be the last person messing around with so I'm
> addressing this to you. :-)
> checkpatch complains about the following:
> WARNING: no space between function name and open parenthesis '('
> #520: FILE: drivers/spi/spi_s3c24xx_dma.c:478:
> + list_for_each_entry (transfer, &message->transfers, transfer_list) {
> which I think is a bit bogus since it actually is a for statement in
> disguise. The following patch adds list_for_each to the list of things
> that look like functions that it shouldn't complain about.

Then you would have to do this for tons other *_for_each*, such as
hlist_for_each, etc, but:

[acme@doppio net-2.6.25]$ find . -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep
'_for_each[a-z_]*(' | wc -l
[acme@doppio net-2.6.25]$ find . -name "*.[ch]" | xargs grep
'_for_each[a-z_]* (' | wc -l
[acme@doppio net-2.6.25]$

I'd say that the common practice in the * _for_each_* use is to do just
what checkpatch does right now, complain if the is a space. Ah, and that
is also my personal preference 8-)

- Arnaldo

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-02 14:27    [W:0.090 / U:5.784 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site