[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: RFC: remove __read_mostly
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 01:33:45 +0100 Andi Kleen <> wrote:

> Kyle McMartin <> writes:
> > I'd bet, in the __read_mostly case at least, that there's no
> > improvement in almost all cases.
> I bet you're wrong. Cache line behaviour is critical, much more
> than pipeline behaviour (which unlikely affects). That is because
> if you eat a cache miss it gets really expensive, which e.g.
> a mispredicted jump is relatively cheap in comparison. We're talking
> one or more orders of magnitude.

So... once we've moved all read-mostly variables into __read_mostly, what
is left behind in bss?

All the write-often variables. All optimally packed together to nicely
maximise cacheline sharing.

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-17 11:37    [W:0.057 / U:1.408 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site