![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread
|
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote: > This is pretty nasty. Why? If the fs doesn't set PG_private or PG_fscache on any pages before calling read_cache_pages(), there's no difference. Furthermore, the differences only crop up in the error handling paths. > I would suggest either to have the function return the number of pages that > were added to pagecache, Which helps how? > or just open code it. Well, I could give an alternative read_cache_pages(), I suppose, for just this situation, but that means there are two parallel functions which then both need to be maintained. David | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-12-17 23:47 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||