[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD
    > Why tax other people with a warning/hang etc. in printk when the
    > problem is very unlikely on their systems?

    I think there is sense in it if you do it subtly differently.

    printk(".. if this hangs do ... \r");
    printk(" \r");

    So that we display it, do the EDD call, then write over it with whatever
    is next that matters.

    That way you'd only see it when it hung - and that might be worth a patch
    and test from someone.

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-12-16 21:27    [W:0.018 / U:29.836 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site