[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] be more verbose when probing EDD
> Why tax other people with a warning/hang etc. in printk when the
> problem is very unlikely on their systems?

I think there is sense in it if you do it subtly differently.

printk(".. if this hangs do ... \r");
printk(" \r");

So that we display it, do the EDD call, then write over it with whatever
is next that matters.

That way you'd only see it when it hung - and that might be worth a patch
and test from someone.

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-16 21:27    [W:0.061 / U:3.760 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site