lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [Bug 9182] Critical memory leak (dirty pages)
    On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:08:52 +0100 (CET) Krzysztof Oledzki <olel@ans.pl> wrote:

    >
    >
    > On Sat, 15 Dec 2007, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
    >
    > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9182
    > >
    > >
    > > ------- Comment #33 from protasnb@gmail.com 2007-12-15 14:19 -------
    > > Krzysztof, I'd hate point you to a hard path (at least time consuming), but
    > > you've done a lot of digging by now anyway. How about git bisecting between
    > > 2.6.20-rc2 and rc1? Here is great info on bisecting:
    > > http://www.kernel.org/doc/local/git-quick.html
    >
    > As I'm smarter than git-bistect I can tell that 2.6.20-rc1-git8 is as bad
    > as 2.6.20-rc2 but 2.6.20-rc1-git8 with one patch reverted seems to be OK.
    > So it took me only 2 reboots. ;)
    >
    > The guilty patch is the one I proposed just an hour ago:
    > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux%2Fkernel%2Fgit%2Fstable%2Flinux-2.6.20.y.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=fba2591bf4e418b6c3f9f8794c9dd8fe40ae7bd9
    >
    > So:
    > - 2.6.20-rc1: OK
    > - 2.6.20-rc1-git8 with fba2591bf4e418b6c3f9f8794c9dd8fe40ae7bd9 reverted: OK
    > - 2.6.20-rc1-git8: very BAD
    > - 2.6.20-rc2: very BAD
    > - 2.6.20-rc4: very BAD
    > - >= 2.6.20: BAD (but not *very* BAD!)
    >

    well.. We have code which has been used by *everyone* for a year and it's
    misbehaving for you alone. I wonder what you're doing that is
    different/special.

    Which filesystem, which mount options, what sort of workload?

    Thanks.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-12-16 05:43    [W:0.025 / U:61.256 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site