lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: QUEUE_FLAG_CLUSTER: not working in 2.6.24 ?
    On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:09:41 +0000 Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:

    > On (13/12/07 14:29), Andrew Morton didst pronounce:
    > > > The simple way seems to be to malloc a large area, touch every page and
    > > > then look at the physical pages assigned ... they now mostly seem to be
    > > > descending in physical address.
    > > >
    > >
    > > OIC. -mm's /proc/pid/pagemap can be used to get the pfn's...
    > >
    >
    > I tried using pagemap to verify the patch but it triggered BUG_ON
    > checks. Perhaps I am using the interface wrong but I would still not
    > expect it to break in this fashion. I tried 2.6.24-rc4-mm1, 2.6.24-rc5-mm1,
    > 2.6.24-rc5 with just the maps4 patches applied and 2.6.23 with maps4 patches
    > applied. Each time I get errors like this;
    >
    > [ 90.108315] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/asm/uaccess_32.h:457
    > [ 90.211227] in_atomic():1, irqs_disabled():0
    > [ 90.262251] no locks held by showcontiguous/2814.
    > [ 90.318475] Pid: 2814, comm: showcontiguous Not tainted 2.6.24-rc5 #1
    > [ 90.395344] [<c010522a>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30
    > [ 90.456948] [<c0105bb2>] show_trace+0x12/0x20
    > [ 90.510173] [<c0105eee>] dump_stack+0x6e/0x80
    > [ 90.563409] [<c01205b3>] __might_sleep+0xc3/0xe0
    > [ 90.619765] [<c02264fd>] copy_to_user+0x3d/0x60
    > [ 90.675153] [<c01b3e9c>] add_to_pagemap+0x5c/0x80
    > [ 90.732513] [<c01b43e8>] pagemap_pte_range+0x68/0xb0
    > [ 90.793010] [<c0175ed2>] walk_page_range+0x112/0x210
    > [ 90.853482] [<c01b47c6>] pagemap_read+0x176/0x220
    > [ 90.910863] [<c0182dc4>] vfs_read+0x94/0x150
    > [ 90.963058] [<c01832fd>] sys_read+0x3d/0x70
    > [ 91.014219] [<c0104262>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
    >
    > ...
    >
    > Just using cp to read the file is enough to cause problems but I included
    > a very basic program below that produces the BUG_ON checks. Is this a known
    > issue or am I using the interface incorrectly?

    I'd say you're using it correctly but you've found a hitherto unknown bug.
    On i386 highmem machines with CONFIG_HIGHPTE (at least) pte_offset_map()
    takes kmap_atomic(), so pagemap_pte_range() can't do copy_to_user() as it
    presently does.

    Drat.

    Still, that shouldn't really disrupt the testing which you're doing. You
    could disable CONFIG_HIGHPTE to shut it up.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-12-15 03:05    [W:0.025 / U:30.092 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site