lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 13 Dec 2007 23:20:44 +0100
FromAdrian Bunk <>
SubjectRFC: remove __read_mostly
I tried the following patch with a full x86 .config [1]:

--- a/include/asm-x86/cache.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/cache.h
-#define __read_mostly __attribute__((__section__(".data.read_mostly")))
+/* #define __read_mostly __attribute__((__section__(".data.read_mostly"))) */
The result [2,3] was:

-rwxrwxr-x 1 bunk bunk 46607243 2007-12-13 19:50 vmlinux.old
-rwxrwxr-x 1 bunk bunk 46598691 2007-12-13 21:55 vmlinux

It's not a surprise that the kernel can become bigger when __read_mostly 
gets used, especially in cases where __read_mostly prevents gcc 
optimizations.

My question is:
Is there anywhere in the kernel a case where __read_mostly brings a 
measurable improvement or can it be removed?

cu
Adrian

[1] mostly allyesconfig with CONFIG_MODULES=n
[2] vmlinux.old is the unpatched kernel
[3] gcc 4.2 was used

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-13 23:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2008