Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:11 +0900 | | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory controller |
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:44:36 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> TODO:
>
> 1. Should we have vm_events for the memory controller as well?
> May be in the longer term
>
ALLOC_STALL is recoreded as failcnt, I think.
I think DIRECT can be accoutned easily.
But I'm not in hurry very much, because all reclaimation is DIRECT, now.
After we implement background reclaim, we should consider it.
Thanks,
-Kame
|  |