lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 11 Dec 2007 14:29:11 +0900
FromKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH][for -mm] fix accounting in vmscan.c for memory controller
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 10:44:36 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Looks good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> TODO:
> 
> 1. Should we have vm_events for the memory controller as well?
>    May be in the longer term
> 

ALLOC_STALL is recoreded as failcnt, I think.
I think DIRECT can be accoutned easily.

But I'm not in hurry very much, because all reclaimation is DIRECT, now.
After we implement background reclaim, we should consider it.

Thanks,
-Kame



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-12-11 06:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2008