![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Stefano Brivio <stefano.brivio@polimi.it> wrote: > Sorry for disappearing. Anyway, yes, those patches fixed it. Precision in > delays isn't that good when using my crappy unstable TSC (mdelay(2000) > causes delays between 2 and 2.9 seconds) but it's not depending on frequency > changes anymore. So I'd say it's fixed, but please tell me if you want me > to do any other test so as to be sure it is. Ingo, it seems you dropped http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/100 (cpu_clock() based udelay), so how udelay can be affected by your proposed changes? Thanks. -- Guillaume | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-12-11 01:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||