Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Dec 2007 14:51:46 -0500 | From | Shane <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.24-rc3-git4 NFS crossmnt regression |
| |
On Dec 10, 2007 9:19 AM, Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > It is best not to use nohide - we should probably mark it as > > 'legacy'. > > > > Simply export the top level mountpoint as 'crossmnt' and everything > > below there will be exported. > > > > > Where should I put those options in root file-system export or in submount export? > > > > crossmnt goes at the top. nohide goes in the submount. Both have > > the same general effect though with subtle differences. > > You don't need both (though that doesn't hurt). > > Just use crossmnt at the top, Then you don't need to mention the > > lower level filesystems at all. > > > > > > ... > > > (I decided to switch to NFS4 only due to the lack of ability to see underlying mounts) > > > > > > > All of this should work fine with v3. Once you have the right patch > > for the crossmnt bug applied, if you have further problems post them > > to linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org. > > > > NeilBrown > > > > Big thanks, > > Still NFS server just don't want to accept the connection > I noticed that if I first mount with > -tnfs, unmount, and then mount with -tnfs4, it works > > > Assuming that > [PATCH 2.6.24-rc4] proc: Remove/Fix proc generic d_revalidate > is the fix for crossmnt bug, I applied it to both client and server, > but no luck.
I'm using NFSv3, but I applied two patches. The one you mention from Eric and the patch Trond posted in this thread.
> > Still see empty folders.
That was the symptom I had without Trond's patch.
Shane
| |