lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 6/6] Use one zonelist that is filtered by nodemask
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:

> > On the other hand, if we call alloc_pages() with GFP_THISNODE set, there
> > is no nid to base the allocation on, so we "fallback" to numa_node_id()
> > [ almost like the nid had been specified as -1 ].
> >
> > So I guess this is logical -- but I wonder, do we have any callers of
> > alloc_pages(GFP_THISNODE) ? It seems like an odd thing to do, when
> > alloc_pages_node() exists?
>
> I don't know if we have any current callers that do this, but absent any
> documentation specifying otherwise, Mel's implementation matches what
> I'd expect the behavior to be if I DID call alloc_pages with 'THISNODE.
> However, we could specify that THISNODE is ignored in __alloc_pages()
> and recommend the use of alloc_pages_node() passing numa_node_id() as
> the nid parameter to achieve the behavior. This would eliminate the
> check for 'THISNODE in __alloc_pages(). Just mask it off before calling
> down to __alloc_pages_internal().
>
> Does this make sense?

I like consistency. If someone absolutely wants a local page then
specifying GFP_THISNODE to __alloc_pages is okay. Leave as is I guess.

What happens though if an MPOL_BIND policy is in effect? The node used
must then be the nearest node from the policy mask....


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-09 18:29    [W:0.407 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site