Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:42:59 +0100 | From | BERTRAND Joël <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.23.1: mdadm/raid5 hung/d-state |
| |
BERTRAND Joël wrote: > Chuck Ebbert wrote: >> On 11/05/2007 03:36 AM, BERTRAND Joël wrote: >>> Neil Brown wrote: >>>> On Sunday November 4, jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com wrote: >>>>> # ps auxww | grep D >>>>> USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME >>>>> COMMAND >>>>> root 273 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D Oct21 14:40 >>>>> [pdflush] >>>>> root 274 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? D Oct21 13:00 >>>>> [pdflush] >>>>> >>>>> After several days/weeks, this is the second time this has happened, >>>>> while doing regular file I/O (decompressing a file), everything on >>>>> the device went into D-state. >>>> At a guess (I haven't looked closely) I'd say it is the bug that was >>>> meant to be fixed by >>>> >>>> commit 4ae3f847e49e3787eca91bced31f8fd328d50496 >>>> >>>> except that patch applied badly and needed to be fixed with >>>> the following patch (not in git yet). >>>> These have been sent to stable@ and should be in the queue for 2.6.23.2 >>> My linux-2.6.23/drivers/md/raid5.c contains your patch for a long >>> time : >>> >>> ... >>> spin_lock(&sh->lock); >>> clear_bit(STRIPE_HANDLE, &sh->state); >>> clear_bit(STRIPE_DELAYED, &sh->state); >>> >>> s.syncing = test_bit(STRIPE_SYNCING, &sh->state); >>> s.expanding = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_SOURCE, &sh->state); >>> s.expanded = test_bit(STRIPE_EXPAND_READY, &sh->state); >>> /* Now to look around and see what can be done */ >>> >>> /* clean-up completed biofill operations */ >>> if (test_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete)) { >>> clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.pending); >>> clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.ack); >>> clear_bit(STRIPE_OP_BIOFILL, &sh->ops.complete); >>> } >>> >>> rcu_read_lock(); >>> for (i=disks; i--; ) { >>> mdk_rdev_t *rdev; >>> struct r5dev *dev = &sh->dev[i]; >>> ... >>> >>> but it doesn't fix this bug. >>> >> >> Did that chunk starting with "clean-up completed biofill operations" end >> up where it belongs? The patch with the big context moves it to a >> different >> place from where the original one puts it when applied to 2.6.23... >> >> Lately I've seen several problems where the context isn't enough to make >> a patch apply properly when some offsets have changed. In some cases a >> patch won't apply at all because two nearly-identical areas are being >> changed and the first chunk gets applied where the second one should, >> leaving nowhere for the second chunk to apply. > > I always apply this kind of patches by hands, and no by patch > command. Last patch sent here seems to fix this bug : > > gershwin:[/usr/scripts] > cat /proc/mdstat > Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] > md7 : active raid1 sdi1[2] md_d0p1[0] > 1464725632 blocks [2/1] [U_] > [=====>...............] recovery = 27.1% (396992504/1464725632) > finish=1040.3min speed=17104K/sec
Resync done. Patch fix this bug.
Regards,
JKB - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |