lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
Date
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 23:56:57 +0100
ciol <ciol13@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, I'd like to ask you a few questions:
>
> * Do you like the way linux distributions integrate the kernel?
>
> * Wouldn't you prefer they ship with the stable and still maintained
> 2.6.16.X, while providing optionally the latest kernel for those who
> want or just have a new hardware?
>
> * Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't
> trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why)
>
>
>
> [1] http://www.modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2007/03/03/T19_15_26/
>
>
> (I'm going to ask this for several projects, not only the kernel)
>

It's a free world, do what you want.

--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-08 07:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans