[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] sched: avoid large irq-latencies in smp-balancing

    On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 17:10 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > >
    > > It would be nice if sched_nr_migrate didn't exist, really. It's hard to
    > > imagine anyone wanting to tweak it, apart from developers.
    > I'm not so sure about that. It is a tunable for RT. That is we can tweak
    > this value to be smaller if we don't like the latencies it gives us.
    > This is one of those things that sacrifices performance for latency.
    > The higher the number, the better it can spread tasks around, but it
    > also causes large latencies.
    > I've just included this patch into and it brought down an
    > unbounded latency to just 42us. (previously we got into the
    > milliseconds!).
    > Perhaps when this feature matures, we can come to a good defined value
    > that would be good for all. But until then, I recommend keeping this a
    > tunable.

    Why not use the latency-expectation infrastructure?

    Iterate under lock until (or before...) the system global latency is

    - Eric

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-08 01:27    [W:0.020 / U:11.388 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site