lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser


On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:28:48PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> > Can we avoid string parsers in the kernel?
> >
>
> Ok, Could someone suggest a better idea please ?.

I personally think string parsers are *much* better than the alternatives
(which basically boil down to nasty binary interfaces)

> I thought about packing the rules in a structure and sending
> it over an ioctl() command. Is this applicable ?

That's *MUCH* worse.

Strings are nice. They aren't that complex, and as long as it's not a
performance-critical area, there are basically no downsides.

Binary structures and ioctl's are *much* worse. They are totally
undebuggable with generic tools (think "echo" or "strace"), and they are a
total nightmare to parse across architectures and pointer sizes.

So the rule should be: always use strings if at all possible and relevant.
If the data is fundamentally binary, it shouldn't be re-coded to ascii (no
real advantage), but if the data is "stringish", and there aren't big
performance issues, then keep it as strings.

Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-05 17:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans