lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Is gcc thread-unsafe?
Linus Torvalds writes:
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > Has it already been decided who will do this audit, and when this
> > audit will happen ? Has a target date been set when this audit
> > should be complete, or is the completion of this audit a
> > requirement for the release of a specific gcc version ?
>
> I am told that the gcc people realized that was indeed a bug
> (people were able to show problems even in non-threaded
> environments with mprotect()), and have now fixed it in the current
> gcc sources. That still leaves the old versions with potential
> problems, but I think it makes it much less interesting to audit
> for these things.

We're back-porting the patch to all open branches. However, this
patch only affects one paticular case where gcc introduces a data
race; we're sure there are others not fixed.

Andrew.

--
Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK
Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-04 19:01    [W:0.042 / U:1.456 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site