lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 03 Nov 2007 23:20:36 -0700
FromJeremy Fitzhardinge <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH] replace "make ARCH=i386/x86_64 with make ARCH=x86"
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> This also opens a chicken-and-egg problem...  What kind of config is
> generated by allmodconfig when ARCH==x86?  There is no good answer.

With a unified x86 architecture, the decision to compile with 32 or
64-bit mode isn't really different from SMP vs UP, PAE vs non-PAE and so
on.  It's just a config option with global effects.  Over time, the
number of config options with are really 32 or 64-bit specific will
probably pretty small.

> The existing tradition of switching between 32-bit and 64-bit was
> quite nice, and it was done in The Obvious Way(tm) -- via the method
> for specifying the architecture/platform.  Switching to Kconfig for
> that decision is a step backwards in usability and IMO violates the
> Principle of Least Surprise.

The architecture is now x86, with a further 32 or 64-bit parameter.  We
already have config options for setting the sub-architecture.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-04 07:23    [from the cache]
©2003-2008