lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 20/27] ptrace: arch_has_block_step
    Date
    > Roland McGrath wrote:
    > <snip>
    > >
    > > +#ifndef arch_has_block_step
    > > +/**
    > > + * arch_has_block_step - does this CPU support user-mode block-step?
    > > + *
    > > + * If this is defined, then there must be a function declaration or inline
    > > + * for user_enable_block_step(), and arch_has_single_step() must be defined
    > > + * too. arch_has_block_step() should evaluate to nonzero iff the machine
    > > + * supports step-until-branch for user mode. It can be a constant or it
    > > + * can test a CPU feature bit.
    > > + */
    > > +#define arch_has_single_step() (0)
    >
    > should this be #define arch_has_block_step() (0)

    Oops, yes it should.


    Thanks,
    Roland
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-29 01:01    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean