lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 20/27] ptrace: arch_has_block_step
Date
> Roland McGrath wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> > +#ifndef arch_has_block_step
> > +/**
> > + * arch_has_block_step - does this CPU support user-mode block-step?
> > + *
> > + * If this is defined, then there must be a function declaration or inline
> > + * for user_enable_block_step(), and arch_has_single_step() must be defined
> > + * too. arch_has_block_step() should evaluate to nonzero iff the machine
> > + * supports step-until-branch for user mode. It can be a constant or it
> > + * can test a CPU feature bit.
> > + */
> > +#define arch_has_single_step() (0)
>
> should this be #define arch_has_block_step() (0)

Oops, yes it should.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-29 01:01    [W:0.101 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site