Messages in this thread | | | From | Roland McGrath <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 20/27] ptrace: arch_has_block_step | Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:58:34 -0800 (PST) |
| |
> Roland McGrath wrote: > <snip> > > > > +#ifndef arch_has_block_step > > +/** > > + * arch_has_block_step - does this CPU support user-mode block-step? > > + * > > + * If this is defined, then there must be a function declaration or inline > > + * for user_enable_block_step(), and arch_has_single_step() must be defined > > + * too. arch_has_block_step() should evaluate to nonzero iff the machine > > + * supports step-until-branch for user mode. It can be a constant or it > > + * can test a CPU feature bit. > > + */ > > +#define arch_has_single_step() (0) > > should this be #define arch_has_block_step() (0)
Oops, yes it should.
Thanks, Roland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |