Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 28 Nov 2007 14:04:40 -0500 | From | Jeff Dike <> | Subject | [PATCH 3/4] UML - after_sleep_interval should return something |
| |
[ This should be merged with uml-fix-no_hz-busy-loop.patch ]
I forgot to have an int-returning function actually return something.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com> --- arch/um/os-Linux/time.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Index: linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.22.orig/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2007-11-28 10:42:52.000000000 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.22/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c 2007-11-28 11:37:19.000000000 -0500 @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ long long os_nsecs(void) #ifdef UML_CONFIG_NO_HZ static int after_sleep_interval(struct timespec *ts) { + return 0; } #else static inline long long timespec_to_us(const struct timespec *ts) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |