Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro. | From | Roland Dreier <> | Date | Sun, 25 Nov 2007 12:29:39 -0800 |
| |
> Yes, and if a symbol is already used by multiple modules, it's generically > useful. And if so, why restrict it to in-tree modules?
I agree that we shouldn't make things too hard for out-of-tree modules, but I disagree with your first statement: there clearly is a large class of symbols that are used by multiple modules but which are not generically useful -- they are only useful by a certain small class of modules.
- R. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |