lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSat, 24 Nov 2007 23:29:41 +0100
FromPavel Machek <>
SubjectRe: nohz and strange sleep latencies
On Thu 2007-11-22 21:29:51, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Pavel Machek wrote:> > > but perhaps somehow we miss this fact and fail to turn off the lapic 
> > > clockevents drivers?> > > > Ok, I guess I'm lost. If I offline second CPU, I immediately get
> > 1000Hz timer tick... is that expected?> > Hmm. No. I have no idea why this is happening.> > 34196 total events, 55.083 events/sec> echo 0 >/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online> 36073 total events, 54.679 events/sec

Strange...

> Just to make sure what we are hunting: Do you have the same problem
> with an non-pavel-tainted 2.6.24-rc3 ?

The effect described above disappeared from both clean and
tainted-pavel trees...?

But I have verified again that time sleep 0.01 is perfectly willing to
sleep for 0.9second on untainted 2.6.24-rc3...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-24 23:31    [from the cache]
©2003-2008