![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi On Nov 20, 2007 10:53 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote: <snip> > > >> > > curious: what scheduler/kernel version have you used before?> >> > I was using 2.6.23.1 with ck patches.>> are you sure? The last -ck patch i can find is for .22: >> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/2.6/>> or have they been forward ported? (if yes, do you have an URL for that) >> (my guess is you used the 2.6.23.1 scheduler (CFS), so the improvement > you felt on the laptop is relative to 2.6.23-vanilla in essence - which > is good news.) Well, it seems that Matthew has been faster than me :-) Yes, I got -ck patches from kamikaze sources. >> > > > Just a question: does the patch include the fix (divide by > > > > zero....) you just posted in the stable review for 2.6.23.9?> > >> > > yeah.> >> > OK, thanks. Have you already tried to apply the patch to 2.6.23.9? > > Shall we expect some other rejects?>> hm:>> The latest stable version of the Linux kernel is: 2.6.23.8 >> so there's no 23.9 yet.>> Ingo > I meant the 23.9 patches that Greg KH posted some hours ago for review. I guess I will find myself in a couple of days. To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my point ov view: 23.1 < 23.1+ck < 23.8+cfs.24 where 23.1+ck is slightly better than vanilla 23.1 and 23.8+cfs.24 is much better than 23.1+ck. My workload is pretty standard, F8+kde+firefox+kmail+amsn, some kernel compile and so on. Regards, Fabio - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-11-21 09:53 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||