[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] sata_nv: don't use legacy DMA in ADMA mode
    Robert Hancock wrote:
    > Tejun Heo wrote:
    >> Tejun Heo wrote:
    >>> If so, can you please add that switching into register mode is okay as
    >>> long as there's no other ADMA commands in flight and add
    >>> WARN_ON((qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF) && link->sactive)?
    >> More accurately, link->sactive test can be substituted with
    >> (ap->qc_allocated & ~(1 << qc->tag)).
    > Unfortunately we only get the ata_port and ata_taskfile in the tf_read
    > callback, so I'm not sure if we can do the equivalent of the qc->flags &
    > ATA_QCFLAG_RESULT_TF test (i.e. distinguishing between the
    > error-handling case where we care if we abort outstanding commands and
    > the normal case with a RESULT_TF command where we do)..

    You can test it in ->qc_issue(), no?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-22 01:51    [W:0.022 / U:3.740 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site