lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 20 Nov 2007 06:51:13 +0100
FromIngo Molnar <>
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/24] consolidate msr.h
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 04:42:48PM -0200, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > > -	wrmsrl(MSR_CSTAR, ia32_cstar_target);
> > > +	wrmsrl(MSR_CSTAR, (u64)ia32_cstar_target);
> >
> > Hmm, why do you add explicit casts? The compiler should convert that
> > correctly on its own.
> >
> > > +static inline void wrmsrl(unsigned int msr, unsigned long long val)
> >
> > Hmm, long long is 64 bit on all x86, but why not use explicit u64 to
> > show that?
> 
> (quick reply)
> 
> With PVOPS on it gives compiler warnings without that explict cast. 
> Without looking at the code, IIRC with non-PVOPS it is a macro 
> directly into asm, so it didn't matter what the cast was. But with 
> PVOPS as a function, it gave compiler warnings.
> 
> Take it out and try compiling it for both i386 and x86_64. One of them 
> gave warnings. But maybe it's not a problem now.

i dont think there's ever any true need (and good cause) to force 
integer type casts like that at the callee site.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-20 06:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2008