Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 18 Nov 2007 12:07:37 -0500 (EST) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: broken suspend [Was: 2.6.24-rc2-mm1] |
| |
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 11/18/2007 04:23 PM, RafaÅ J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sunday, 18 of November 2007, Jiri Slaby wrote: > >> On 11/18/2007 04:03 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >>> Can you also make the new System-map available, please? > >> Sure: > >> http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/System.map1 > > > > The last notifier called in http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/susp_hang2.png > > Last... Note, that it's only first 20 invokations of notifiers, there are > bazillion of them when I remove the condition '< 20'. > > > is apparently cpu_swap_callback() which is not called in > > http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/sklad/susp_hang1.png . > > > > Can you verify that cpu_swap_callback() gets called if the patch is not > > applied? > > Does this still apply?
You'll get more useful results if you redo your changes to notifier_call_chain(). Have it print out the address of the routine _before_ making the call, and don't limit it to 20. That way you'll know exactly which notifier routine ends up hanging.
Alan Stern
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |