[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Is it possible to give the user the option to cancel forkbombs?

    On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:53 +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
    > El Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:42:51 -0800, Martin Olsson <> escribió:
    > > I don't think that setting a max process count by default is a
    > > good/viable solution.
    > I don't see why...OS X had a default limit of 100 processes per uid (increased
    > to 266 in 10.5) and "it works" (many people notices it, but it's not surprising
    > since the limit is too restrictive).
    > If you don't have limits, you can't avoid starvation easily. From my experience,
    > since I use CFS, fork/compile bombs (forgetting to put a number after make -j...)
    > are very sluggish mainly because the whole graphic subsystem is paged out.

    I don't know if this is at all feasible, but is it possible to have a
    mechanism that would detect a fork bomb in progress and either stop the
    fork, or allow the user to cancel the operation? For example, are there
    any legitimate processes (i.e. ones that really need to fork like crazy)
    that would need to generate 200+ processes in less than 1 second?

    (Note: I'm not a programmer; I'm just throwing out the idea.)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-17 18:57    [W:0.023 / U:147.368 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site