lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] fuse writable mmap design
From
Date
> > OTOH, I'm thinking about adding a per-fs limit (adjustable for
> > privileged mounts) of dirty+writeback.
> >
> > I'm not sure how hard would it be to add support for this into
> > balance_dirty_pages(). So I'm thinking of a parameter in struct
> > backing_dev_info that is used to clip the calculated per-bdi threshold
> > below this maximum.
> >
> > How would that affect the proportions algorithm? What would happen to
> > the unused portion? Would it adapt to the slowed writeback and
> > allocate it to some other writer?
>
> The unused part is gone, I've not yet found a way to re-distribute this
> fairly.
>
> [ It's one of my open-problems, I can do a min_ratio per bdi, but not
> yet a max_ratio ]

OK, I'll bear this in mind.

Limiting the number of dirty+writeback to << dirty_thresh could still
make sense, since it could prevent a nasty filesystem from pinning
lots of kernel memory (which it can do without fuse in other ways, so
this is not very important IMO).

Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-15 21:15    [W:0.496 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site