[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news
    From: Andi Kleen <>
    Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:38:38 +0100

    > At least for x86 and I suspect some 1other architectures we don't
    > initially need a syscall at all for this. There is an instruction
    > RDPMC who can read a performance counter just fine. It is also much
    > faster and generally preferable for the case where a process measures
    > events about itself. In fact it is essential for one of the use cases
    > I would like to see perfmon used (replacement of RDTSC for cycle
    > counting)

    I wouldn't even want to use a syscall for something like
    that on Sparc, I'd rather give this a dedicated software
    trap so that I can code it completely in assembler.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-14 20:51    [W:0.019 / U:10.976 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site