[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench
    On Tuesday 13 November 2007 06:44, Christoph Lameter wrote:
    > On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
    > > BTW. your size-2048 kmalloc cache is order-1 in the default setup,
    > > wheras kmalloc(1024) or kmalloc(4096) will be order-0 allocations. And
    > > SLAB also uses order-0 for size-2048. It would be nice if SLUB did the
    > > same...
    > You can try to see the effect that order 0 would have by booting with
    > slub_max_order=0

    Yeah, that didn't help much, but in general I think it would give
    more consistent and reliable behaviour from slub.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-11-14 01:07    [W:0.029 / U:34.196 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site