lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/16] make vsmp a paravirt client
Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> This patch makes vsmp a paravirt client. It now uses the whole
> infrastructure provided by pvops. When we detect we're running
> a vsmp box, we change the irq-related paravirt operations (and so,
> it have to happen quite early), and the patching function
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64 | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c | 3 ++
> arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/asm-x86/setup.h | 3 +-
> 4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64 b/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> index 04734dd..544bad5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> @@ -148,15 +148,14 @@ config X86_PC
> bool "PC-compatible"
> help
> Choose this option if your computer is a standard PC or compatible.
> -
> config X86_VSMP
> bool "Support for ScaleMP vSMP"
> depends on PCI
> + select PARAVIRT
> help
> Support for ScaleMP vSMP systems. Say 'Y' here if this kernel is
> supposed to run on these EM64T-based machines. Only choose this option
> if you have one of these machines.
> -
> endchoice
>
> choice
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> index 44a11e3..c522549 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>
> init_memory_mapping(0, (end_pfn_map << PAGE_SHIFT));
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VSMP
> + vsmp_init();
> +#endif
> dmi_scan_machine();
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> index 414caf0..547d3b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> @@ -8,18 +8,70 @@
> *
> * Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalemp.com>,
> * Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
> + * Paravirt ops integration: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> */
> -
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
> #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
> #include <asm/pci-direct.h>
> #include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Interrupt control for the VSMP architecture:
> + */
> +
> +static inline unsigned long vsmp_save_fl(void)
>

No point being inline.

> +{
> + unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> + if (flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
> + return X86_EFLAGS_IF;
>

Is this right, or should the if be testing _AC? Otherwise, why not just
"return flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF"?

> + return 0;
> +}
>
> -static int __init vsmp_init(void)
> +static inline void vsmp_restore_fl(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + if (flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
> + flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_AC;
> + if (!(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF))
> + flags &= X86_EFLAGS_AC;
>

Just use "else"?

> + native_restore_fl(flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void vsmp_irq_disable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> + vsmp_restore_fl((flags & ~X86_EFLAGS_IF));
>

((double paren?))

> +}
> +
> +static inline void vsmp_irq_enable(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> + vsmp_restore_fl((flags | X86_EFLAGS_IF));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned __init vsmp_patch(u8 type, u16 clobbers, void *ibuf,
> + unsigned long addr, unsigned len)
> +{
> + switch (type) {
> + case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.irq_enable):
> + case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.irq_disable):
> + case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.save_fl):
> + case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.restore_fl):
> + return paravirt_patch_default(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
> + default:
> + return native_patch(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
> + }
> +
> +}
> +
> +int __init vsmp_init(void)
> {
> void *address;
> - unsigned int cap, ctl;
> + unsigned int cap, ctl, cfg;
>
> if (!early_pci_allowed())
> return 0;
> @@ -29,8 +81,16 @@ static int __init vsmp_init(void)
> (read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID) != PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL))
> return 0;
>
> + /* If we are, use the distinguished irq functions */
> + pv_irq_ops.irq_disable = vsmp_irq_disable;
> + pv_irq_ops.irq_enable = vsmp_irq_enable;
> + pv_irq_ops.save_fl = vsmp_save_fl;
> + pv_irq_ops.restore_fl = vsmp_restore_fl;
> + pv_init_ops.patch = vsmp_patch;
> +
> /* set vSMP magic bits to indicate vSMP capable kernel */
> - address = ioremap(read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0), 8);
> + cfg = read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
> + address = early_ioremap(cfg, 8);
> cap = readl(address);
> ctl = readl(address + 4);
> printk("vSMP CTL: capabilities:0x%08x control:0x%08x\n", cap, ctl);
> @@ -42,8 +102,6 @@ static int __init vsmp_init(void)
> printk("vSMP CTL: control set to:0x%08x\n", ctl);
> }
>
> - iounmap(address);
> + early_iounmap(address, 8);
> return 0;
> }
> -
> -core_initcall(vsmp_init);
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/setup.h b/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> index 071e054..dd7996c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ void __init add_memory_region(unsigned long long start,
>
> extern unsigned long init_pg_tables_end;
>
> -
> +/* For EM64T-based VSMP machines */
> +int vsmp_init(void);
>
> #endif /* __i386__ */
> #endif /* _SETUP */
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-01 05:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans