[lkml]   [2007]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] cpuset relative memory policies - second choice
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007, Paul Jackson wrote:

> > > Forcing coders to specify the same detail in multiple places, when
> > > there is no way to validate their consistency, doesn't force them
> > > to think or do it right. It increases the error rate due to
> >
> > There are always wrappers for system calls. The flags will be set in
> > these.
> We were discussing libnuma here, not glibc. The system call wrappers
> are in glibc. System call wrappers should not be setting optional
> flags. They should just make the system call -- do whatever magic it
> takes to get the provided arguments into the right registers or other
> conventionally determined places, and invoke the necessary machine
> instruction to trap into the kernel.

The library interface can set flags to modify behavior.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-11-01 18:11    [W:0.113 / U:5.440 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site