Messages in this thread | | | Subject | [PATCH]dose it make get_swap_page(mm/swapfiles.c) good performance ?, kernel<2.6.22.9>. | Date | Sat, 6 Oct 2007 09:04:03 +0900 (JST) | From | ohyama_sec@ariel-ne ... |
| |
-hiroyasu ohyama
I wonder what corrected attached source makes good performance of getting page slot cluster from page area discripter which is written "si" in the source codes. Because I think head of swap_list_t discripter doesn't suggest index of swap area which is same priority that swap_list.next but one which is the highest priority in the priority's list. the si->swap_map which have high priority may be chosen by get_swap_page(), so that page slot of low priority's swap area may have more blank cluster than one of hich priority's swap area. Then, I think substitute "swap_list.head" for "next" is privent them from finding cluster of page slot when "swap_info[next].prio"'s priority is different swap_list.next.
---
*** mm/swapfile_bck.c 2007-10-04 12:09:37.000000000 +0900 --- mm/swapfile.c 2007-10-04 12:31:34.000000000 +0900 *************** *** 186,193 **** for (type = swap_list.next; type >= 0 && wrapped < 2; type = next) { si = swap_info + type; next = si->next; ! if (next < 0 || ! (!wrapped && si->prio != swap_info[next].prio)) { next = swap_list.head; wrapped++; } --- 186,192 ---- for (type = swap_list.next; type >= 0 && wrapped < 2; type = next) { si = swap_info + type; next = si->next; ! if (next < 0) { next = swap_list.head; wrapped++; }
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |