Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Oct 2007 16:39:18 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag fixes |
| |
Andrew wrote: > I'm getting 100% rejects from this - probably whatever patch it is > patching got lost or unrecognisably mangled.
Yup - so far as I can tell, you didn't pick up the base patch that this current patch fixes. So, no, I wouldn't expect this patch to make any sense.
As I stated in this current patch in the diffstat section after the '---' marker, this current patch applies to the base patch of Subject:
[PATCH] cpuset and sched domains: sched_load_balance flag
You probably didn't pick up that base patch because Nick and I are still haggling over it. Well ... we've agreed, but I can't get the scheduler to work as I thought Nick wanted, and I'm still waiting to hear from Nick again.
==> So yeah - throw this current patch out.
Nick ... you there ?
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |