[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 14:28:45 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> wrote:

> Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) ((u64)-1 >> (64 - (n)))
> >
> Yeah, that's cleaner.

Well yes, but DMA_BIT_MASK(0) invokes undefined behaviour, generates a
compiler warning and evaluates to 0xffffffffffffffff (with my setup).

That won't be a problem in practice, but it is strictly wrong and doesn't set
a good exmaple for the children ;)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-06 00:27    [W:0.043 / U:9.536 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site