[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/1] unify DMA_..BIT_MASK definitions: v3.1
Andrew Morton wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <>
> Now that we have DMA_BIT_MASK(), these macros are pointless.

Except, unfortunately, DMA_64BIT_MASK. I guess we could special case
it, assuming this works in all the contexts the macro is used in (ie,
compile-time constant?):

#define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1))

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-05 22:47    [W:0.089 / U:4.120 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site