[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/2] add new notifier function
    Vivek Goyal wrote:
    > On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 08:38:05PM +0900, Takenori Nagano wrote:
    > In summary, right now co-existence of kdb with kdump seems to be your pain
    > point. I would prefer that kdb just puts a break point on panic() and we move
    > on. If there are more candidates down the line and these can't be easily
    > executed in second kernel then we can re-visit this notification list
    > mechanism.

    Hi Vivek,

    Thank you for your comment. :-)

    I don't mind kdb and kdump problem now. Because my patches are not merged into
    mainline kernel yet. If they are merged, I think how we can resolve about RAS
    tools problem.

    >> # ls
    >> ipmi_msghandler ipmi_wdog
    >> # cat ipmi_msghandler/priority
    >> 200
    >> # cat ipmi_wdog/priority
    >> 150
    >> #
    >> Kernel panic - not syncing: panic
    >> ipmi_msghandler : notifier calls panic_event().
    >> ipmi_watchdog : notifier calls wdog_panic_handler().
    >> .....(reboot)
    > We also need to implement a file which can give a consolidated view. All
    > the registered members and their priority.

    I tried to implement it, but its impact is large. And we can get all priority
    values using "ls" and "cat */priority". I'll implement it if user strongly
    expects it.

    # cd panic_notifier_list
    # ls
    ipmi_msghandler ipmi_wdog
    # cat */priority


    Takenori Nagano <>
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-05 07:49    [W:0.024 / U:19.648 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site