Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:10:02 -0700 | From | "Paul Menage" <> | Subject | Re: Memory controller merge (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24) |
| |
On 10/2/07, Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> wrote: > > I accept that full swap control is something you're intending to add > incrementally later; but the current state doesn't make sense to me.
One comment on swap - ideally it should be a separate subsystem from the memory controller. That way people who are using cpusets to provide memory isolation (rather than using the page-based memory controller) can also get swap isolation.
Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |