Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2007 18:21:25 +0900 | From | Toshiharu Harada <> | Subject | Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) |
| |
On 10/30/2007 5:40 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Oct 30 2007 12:23, Toshiharu Harada wrote: >> Instead of pushing TOMOYO Linux, I started developing >> comparison chart of security-enhance Linux implementations. >> The current version can be found in >> >> http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/wiki-e/?WhatIs#comparison > > Smack Security Model: autolabel, as far as I can tell. I noticed the smell of danger in the naming of "Security Model". Please allow me some time.
> Smack Policy Generation: user - hand - and an editor > Apparmor tutorial (beats any FAQ at first): > ftp://ftp.belnet.be/pub/mirror/FOSDEM/FOSDEM2006-apparmor.avi Updated above two items. Thank you. :)
I'm not an optimist to believe we can reach the perfect comparison. The purpose is to feed information, not to judge. This might sound ironically, but I don't really think we can *compare* them because they have different theories/purposes/backgrounds. Some kind of forgiveness and fuzziness are required.
As I don't want to steal everybody's bandwidth, simple updates will be done silently. Your suggestions and information will be greatly appreciated despite of visible evidence.
Thank you. Toshiharu Harada
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |