Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:17:28 -0700 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option |
| |
David wrote: > The nodemask passed to set_mempolicy() will always have exactly one > meaning: the system nodes that the policy is intended for.
Ok - that makes the meaning of Choice C clearer to me. Thank-you.
We've already got two Choices, one released and one in the oven. Is there an actual, real world situation, motivating this third Choice?
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |