lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)
    On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:27:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
    > On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote:
    > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
    > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
    > > > > The only change is in 2 consecutive columns: "2911 502" -> "2912
    > > > > 500". Is processor usage calculated from those? Can someone explain
    > > > > how?
    > > >
    > > > The latter seems to be utime ...decreasing. No wonder if arithmetics
    > > > will give strange results (probably top is using unsigned delta?)...
    > >
    > > Hmm, minor miscounting from my side, stime seems more appropriate...
    >
    > Here is a series showing utime and stime for kontact over 2 minutes.
    >
    > Values were obtained using (identical values removed):
    > $ while true; do awk '{print $14" "$15}' /proc/5269/stat; sleep 1; done | ts
    >
    > Oct 03 21:17:12 12220 1593
    > Oct 03 21:17:18 12221 1594
    > Oct 03 21:17:26 12222 1593 <--
    > Oct 03 21:17:34 12223 1594
    > Oct 03 21:17:43 12224 1594
    > Oct 03 21:17:51 12224 1595
    > Oct 03 21:17:59 12225 1596
    > Oct 03 21:18:07 12226 1595 <--
    > Oct 03 21:18:15 12227 1596
    > Oct 03 21:18:18 12228 1596
    > Oct 03 21:18:22 12229 1595 <--
    > Oct 03 21:18:31 12230 1596
    > Oct 03 21:18:39 12230 1597
    > Oct 03 21:18:44 12231 1597
    > Oct 03 21:18:48 12232 1596 <--
    > Oct 03 21:18:56 12233 1597
    > Oct 03 21:19:04 12234 1596 <--
    > Oct 03 21:19:11 12235 1597
    >
    > So, is it normal that stime decreases sometimes or a kernel bug?
    > /me expects the last...

    Let me guess... Dual core AMD64 ?

    I'm 99.99% sure that if you boot with "notsc", the problem disappears. If
    so, you have one of those wonderful AMD64 with unsynced clock and without
    HPET to sync with. I wrote a simple program in the past to exhibit the
    problem. It would bsimply run "date +%s" in a busy loops and display each
    time it would change. Amazing. It could jump back and forth by up to 3
    seconds!

    Basically, it looked like this :

    old=$(date +%s)
    while : ; do
    x=$(date +%s)
    if [ $x != $old ]; then
    echo "$old -> $x"
    old=$x
    fi
    done

    Regards,
    Willy

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-03 22:31    [W:0.026 / U:89.460 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site