lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
    On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote:

    > In article <200710032326.FJF32915.OQOOHLMtFSFJFV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (at Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:26:57 +0900), Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> says:
    >
    > > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    > > > Also, how do you avoid referencing dead data with your sll? I haven't
    > > > actually looked at your patches, but the simple scheme you outlined
    > > > didn't handle the iteration + concurrent removal scenario:
    > > Regarding my singly-linked list, no entries are removed from the list. It's append only (like CD-R media).
    > > I set is_deleted flag of a entry instead of removing the entry from the list.
    >
    > It is not a good practice. Please free such objects.
    > BTW, how many objects do you have in the list?

    Doesn't matter. No list should be able to grow without bounds in the
    kernel.

    --
    James Morris
    <jmorris@namei.org>
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-03 16:43    [W:0.023 / U:121.964 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site