lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [TOMOYO 05/15](repost) Domain transition handler functions.
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote:

> In article <200710032326.FJF32915.OQOOHLMtFSFJFV@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> (at Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:26:57 +0900), Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> says:
>
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > Also, how do you avoid referencing dead data with your sll? I haven't
> > > actually looked at your patches, but the simple scheme you outlined
> > > didn't handle the iteration + concurrent removal scenario:
> > Regarding my singly-linked list, no entries are removed from the list. It's append only (like CD-R media).
> > I set is_deleted flag of a entry instead of removing the entry from the list.
>
> It is not a good practice. Please free such objects.
> BTW, how many objects do you have in the list?

Doesn't matter. No list should be able to grow without bounds in the
kernel.

--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-03 16:43    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans