![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that the singly linked list idea has been rejected a few
>> times. Just use the existing API.
> Too bad...
>
> Well, is there a way to avoid read_lock when reading list?
>
> Currently, TOMOYO Linux avoids read_lock, on the assumption that
> (1) First, ptr->next is initialized with NULL.
> (2) Later, ptr->next is assigned non-NULL address.
> (3) Assigning to ptr->next is done atomically.
>
> Regards.
Is it all of the purpose for the list structure?
If so, you can apply RCU instead to avoid read lock
when scanning the list, like:
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry(...) {
....
}
rcu_read_unlock();
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-10-03 15:43 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||