[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: eradicating out of tree modules
    Am 28.10.2007 15:37 schrieb Stefan Richter:
    > Tilman Schmidt wrote:
    >> Am 28.10.2007 10:25 schrieb Stefan Richter:
    >>> You two are hypothesizing.
    >> No, we're not. We're discussing the very real issue of whether
    >> LSM should be amputated in such a way as to make life difficult
    >> for out of tree security module developers.
    > I still believe you are. From what I understood, the API change had
    > technical reasons. (What I have read is that using security modules in
    > the form of loadable and unloadable kernel modules didn't make sense.)

    The jury is still out on that, and it's not my area of expertise
    anyway. But Adrian declared that making life more difficult for
    out-of-tree module developers would in itself be a legitimate
    reason for such a change, and that's what I'm disputing.

    Tilman Schmidt E-Mail:
    Bonn, Germany
    Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
    Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-10-28 17:57    [W:0.021 / U:85.152 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site