![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > > + __release(bitlock); > > This needs a less generic name and maybe a comment explaining that it's > not annotating a proper lock? Or maybe we can drop it completely? Ah, I see that <linux/bit_spinlock.h> does the same thing, so strike that. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-10-28 16:17 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||