lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Oct]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 28 Oct 2007 17:14:12 +0200 (EET)
FromPekka J Enberg <>
SubjectRe: [patch 09/10] SLUB: Do our own locking via slab_lock and slab_unlock.
On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> > +	 __release(bitlock);
> 
> This needs a less generic name and maybe a comment explaining that it's 
> not annotating a proper lock? Or maybe we can drop it completely?

Ah, I see that <linux/bit_spinlock.h> does the same thing, so strike that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-10-28 16:17    [from the cache]
©2003-2008