![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Am 28.10.2007 10:25 schrieb Stefan Richter: > You two are hypothesizing. No, we're not. We're discussing the very real issue of whether LSM should be amputated in such a way as to make life difficult for out of tree security module developers. > - We (most of us) change APIs to improve the kernel. That's good. If that was consensus then this discussion would not be necessary. What I am protesting against is attempts to change the API purposely to obstruct out-of-tree code. That is not a way to improve the kernel. -- Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@imap.cc Bonn, Germany Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits. Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite) [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2007-10-28 12:03 [W:0.970 / U:0.250 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||