![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> [2007-10-28 11:34]: > > If you go down that route, you end up with _lots_ of circular > dependencies - header file X needs Y needs Z which needs X. We've > been there, several times. It very quickly becomes quite > unmaintainable - you end up with hard to predict behaviour from > include files. > > The only realistic solution is to use forward declarations. In header files, yes. But that's not true for implementation files. Thanks, Bernhard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2007-10-28 12:03 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||